|
Report Part 2
The second segment of the tournament got off to a rather quiet start, 4
of the 6 games in round 5 being drawn. Many had anticipated the clash
between Sokolov and Tiviakov, but this turned in to a rather
disappointing 15-mover. To be fair, the end position was niether
here nor there, but it would have been nice to see it played a bit
more. Loek van Wely had to dig his heels in for the draw playing black
against Jan Smeets, and Smeets possibly held some edge in the final
position, but could not do a lot with it. Also drawing were Visser -
Werle, and van der Wiel - l'Ami. Jan Timman's tournament was not going
well at all, and infact, the 54-year-old seemed totally out-prepared.
Perhaps this is understandable, given the fact that he is not playing
so much these days. In this round, he was pretty much demolished by
Friso Nijboer, and suffering one of the few miniatures of a very
illustruios career. The other point scorer of the round, was Daniel
Stellwagen. Playing the Black side of a King's Indian Samisch, things
were not actually going very well for him, infact, white was holding a
clear advantage. However, when Bosch began to linger, Stellwagen
punished, invading White's camp with his rook, and before long, Bosch
was relinquishing the point.
Round 6, then, saw every game being decisive. Tiviakov once again
employed the c3-Sicilian against van der Wiel. After some jostling
around for position, Tiviakov took command, penetrating Black's 2nd
rank. By the time van der Wiel had created himself some play, the
damage had been done, and the point was never in doubt really. What
would the Dutch Championships be without a Dutch Defence? Friso Nijboer
obliged in his game against Erwin L'Ami. In honesty, L'Ami was his own
un-doing in this round, his 7.g4 looking highly dubious, and being the
start of what seems to be a faulty plan. After 9.Bh3, his position
deteriorated, and soon Black had the edge. When Black was able to
triple along the f-file later on, it was the beginning of a decisive
attack, and though Erwin battened down the hatches, black's passed
c-pawn was the final nail in the coffin. A nice game by Nijboer. After
the disasterous previous round, Jan Timman bounced back with a win
over Jan Smeets. To be honest, his novelty (in the Najdorf Sicilian),
of 13.Bc4 was not good, and after 13...dxe3, black seems to hold the
upper hand by far. Smeets' 15...Ne5 was a very bad mistake, (15...Kd8
being much better), and the losing move (16...Bd6) came immediately
after. Timman pounced with 17.Rxd4 and 18.Bxf7+, and the attack was
decisive. The game was far from perfect, but still nice to see Timman
scoring against the younger players in the field ... no offence to
Smeets intended of course! Werle - van Wely was a Queens Gambit
Declined, Anti-Meran, which saw a novelty from White with 13.Na4 --
usual is 13.Nxf6 Nxf6, 14.Na4, and accelerating things does not seem to
be an improvement. van Wely chose 15...h5, over the other option of
taking the two bishops with ...Nxg3, followed by 16...Qc7, when black
is doing very nicely. As it was, things were probably in Black's
favour, and when the queens came off the board at move 19, White's
position was already very difficult. van Wely had the point in 36.
Stellwagen
and Sokolov got in to a Closed Ruy, Smyslov variation, and followed
theory until Stellwagen's 22.Rxe5, which seems new. As can be seen from
the diagram, left, this is a very bold decision, as it leaves the
b3-pawn hanging, and Sokolov took up the gauntlet with 22...Qxb3. There
followed: 23.Bf4 Qxd1, 24.Rxd1, and here, Sokolov's best was probably
to exchange on e5. However, he played 24...c6, after which Stellwagen
exchanged rooks himself, and quickly won a pawn. His position gradually
increased in dominance, and when he invested a rook to queen a pawn, it
was all over bar the shouting. Sokolov could only hope to make things
difficult, and that Stellwagen would make a mistake. This did not
happen, infact it was Sokolov himself who made the mistake, which left
his remaining pieces in precarious positions to White's Queen. Sokolov
resigned.
Also a winner of round 6, was Yge Visser, dispatching Jeroen Bosch in 48 moves.
Ivan
Sokolov bounced back from the previous round, with his round 7 win over
Yge Visser. Visser employed the King's Indian against Sokolov's 1.d4,
and for a while was doing ok. Sokolov mis-played things slightly with
his 20.Qb4. The move was not bad as such, but he could have done better
with 20.Qe7. However, he did go along this line a move later, as shown
by the diagram, right, after Visser had just played 20...a5. I am sorry
if the red squares look a bit confusing, but they are important,
showing the power of the move, and illustrating how accurate black must
be when proceeding. The issues are, that the Nf6 is attacked twice, the
e-pawn is also en-prise, and although I haven't made it red, the
d7-bishop is only defended by the Nf6 and so is beginning to sweat a
bit. This follows that the best move is ...Re8 (it attacks the queen,
(therefore giving the Nf6 a reprieve) and defends the e-pawn. ...Qd8
allows Qxd8 followed by Nxe5). However, 21...Re8, (as Visser played),
also hangs f7. As is often in chess, when you have a tough position,
answering one threat (or in this case two) usually gives your opponent
something else. There followed: 22.Qxf7 Qd6, 23.Nh4 Rf8, and Sokolov
continued powerfully with, 24.Nxg6+! hxg6, 25.Qxg6. Here, Visser's best
chance of saving things was probably 25...Rg8, but he played the flawed
25...Be8, seemingly having lost his sense of danger. There came
26.Qxg7+! which won a piece after ...Kxg7 thanks to the black queen
being on d6. Sokolov merely hopped his knight to f5 to regain the
material. From this point, white had a huge initiative, but Sokolov
probably gave himself and his supporters a bit of a scare by letting
things slip a bit towards the end. A final endgame mistake by Visser of
48...Nd7 allowing 49.Kc3, however, opened the door once again for
White, and the point was Sokolov's on move 57.
Loek van Wely had an interesting time against Jan Timman in their match. Playing the white side of a Nimzo Indian, he
faced a Timman novelty, 13...axb4. After some exchanges on the Q-side
(including a pair of rooks) things got incredibly sharp, and my hair
went nearly as white as Timman's trying to make sense of it. The state
of affairs is show in the diagram to the right, and Jan Timman had just
played 21...g5. van Wely continued 22.Rxf2 (best) and Timman replied
22...g4. It is situations such as this that humbles any chess
commentator, I think, when we consider that the players are having to
work all the questions out on their own, and in a certain amount of
time. van Wely continued strongest, taking some advantage with 23.Nxe5.
Unfortunately I never got to ask Timman if he had overlooked this move.
I doubt it, but white seems to have a very good game from here. From
Timman's 23...dxe5, his prospects seemed to gradually worsen, until
things got a bit edgy again around the 30 move mark. Chess is full of
ebbs and flows. A few time-gaining moves were made, around which time
things looked about equal, and probably should have gone to a draw I
suppose, but a slip by Timman allowed van Wely to win a pawn and obtain
a powerful d-pawn passer. From there the result was in no doubt, and
Timman resigned.
With the greatest of respect to John van der Wiel, his win over
Daniel Stellwagen surprised me. The reason for this, is primarily
because Stellwagen had looked to be getting stronger in the last couple
of rounds, but maybe his victory over Sokolov in the previous round had
taken its toll. Playing Black in a Sicilian Paulsen, he was never
really in the game, and infact his position looked quite disorganised.
White had a winning advantage by move 20, and though Stellwagen fought
on bravely, van der Wiel had wrapped things up by move 30. Leader
Tiviakov must have wished there was a tournament masseur after his game
against Friso Nijboer. It was a Scandinavian, and lasted 94 moves!
White had a slight opening advantage, but Tiviakov improved his
position gradually until he had equalised, around move 23. Despite the
opposite coloured bishops, the game seemed to be heading for a draw,
until White started to get quite passive, and black began to get
active. Suddenly Tiviakov's K-side pawns began to march forward, and
soon after he had posted his knight rather annoyingly on d3. Being
fair, both players made mistakes they were not punished for towards the
end of the game, (which saw the Black king march up to the white side
of the board), but all things being considered this is most
understandable. I think that they will have been most relieved to shake
hands and declare peace. The other winner of the round was Jan Werle,
equalising in his game against Jeroen Bosch quite comfortably. Black
started to take over the position rather quickly, and white was already
under pressure before Werle was able to sacrifice the exchange, leaving
himself with queen and 2 bishops v the queen and rook of Bosch. The
black position was vastly superior, and Bosch was oon resigning. The
remaining game, Smeets v l'Ami was drawn quickly.
Round
8, the round before the second (and final) rest day, was full of
excitement, and saw two of the tournament favourites losing. The first
victim was leader Sergei Tiviakov, who maybe was still suffering for
the near 100-mover he had in the previous round. In this round, he was
white against Jan Smeets, who came armed and ready for a c3-sicilian.
Smeets left theory early, playing 7...Qe6+, and doing very nicely from
it. White seemed to get a little bogged down, and black took hold of
the position little by little, allowing Tiviakov no freeing of his
position. By 25...Nc6, (see diagram, left), things had already started
to look very tricky for White, then came 26.dxe4 Nd4+, 27.Kf1 fxe4,
when the balance rests with black, and all white can do is fight and
hope for a mistake. The mistake didn't come, and a few moves later,
black had powerful d and e-pawns, the former being passed. Smeets
played powerfully, winning a piece, and very soon the game. A really
nice game this, and for me one of the games of the tournament!
The
second favourite to fall, was Loek van Wely, who had been having quite
a disappointing tournament by his standards. I think that Loek would be
the first to admit, that he had missed a few chances in this
tournament, and his game against Erwin l'Ami, was certainly one of
them. The game was a Semi-Slav, and followed Pantsulaia - Karjakin,
Sweden 2005, until van Wely's 14...Rxf8 (Karjakin had played 14...Kxf8
and the game had been drawn in 24). After 16.Ne4, White obtained a
knight on d6 rather easily, but this only seemed good enough for
equality. Possibly better was opening things up on the queenside
(asking black the question of where he intended to put his king) with
16.b3. As it was, after 18.a4 f6, 19.Bf3, van Wely seems to have
overlooked or decided against the best option of 19...Ba6, in favour of
19...a6, which did not seem to help him at all. The diagram position,
left, shows the situation after White's 27.Qa2. It seems that Black is
being buried alive with the pressure along the a-file, but the reality
is, that White is toast in this position. van Wely struck with
27...Rxf3! and White must re-capture (Ra7 for example is not good
enough, due to 28...Qxf2+, and after forced exchanges, the c-pawn is
decisive). After 28.gxf3 c2! White still can not do anything along
the a-file, for either the pawn promotes and ruins things, or ...Rd1+
does. Erwin chose 29.b4? which should have lost to ...Rd1+, 30.Kg2
Qxe5, but van Wely erred with 29...c1=Q+? and handed the edge back to
white. Soon after l'Ami was a rook to the good, investing it back for
Blacks knight and some pawns and was soon mopping up. van Wely resigned
on move 58. After the rest day I spoke to Erwin l'Ami (who is sincerely
one of the most pleasent younger generation of GM's there is) at
Hilversum, and he agreed to annotate this game for Chess Gateway some
time in the future, and I am sure that you look forward to that as much
as I do!
Briefly, the other results were wins for Sokolov against Bosch, and van
der Wiel as black against Visser. Jan Timman kept newbie GM Jan Werle
at bay, drawing in 60. As if his round 7 epic against Sergei Tiviakov
was not enough, Friso Nijboer went even longer against Daniel
Stellwagen, in a 103-move Sicilian, which was drawn.
This left the situation as follows at the second rest day: Tiviakov --
6.0/8; Sokolov, van Wely -- 5.5/8; van der Wiel, Stellwagen -- 4.5/8,
Nijboer, L'Ami, Werle -- 4.0/8; Smeets -- 3.5/8; Timman -- 3.0/8; Bosch
-- 2.0/8; Visser -- 1.5/8.
|